| Inside This Issue |
| 1. Bredent's New Screw System |
| 2. Bredent's New Precision Attachment |
| 3. Ancient Dental Implant Found |
| 4. Kym Rada, RDT Interviewed on VKS |
| 5. Factors for Attachment Selection |
New
Bredent Precision Attachment
Bredent has succeeded in integrating a shear distributor
into a new type of prefabricated attachment. No additional milled in lingual
arm is required when using the new "Vario Soft 3 mini SV" precision attachment.
This lowers the fabrication costs for combined fixed / removable appliances
with ridged, extracoronal attachments considerably. At the same time, the
aesthetics are also enchanted noticeably for the patient as the shear distribution
arm is not needed. This prefabricated component is only 3.5 mm wide and
4 mm long and includes a patrix and shear distributor. The male attachment
is made of burn out resin and is waxed onto and cast in one piece with
the wax pattern of the retaining crown. Bredent supplies very precisely
fitting females for creating exactly the degree of long-term friction required
by the specific patient. the females are available in three degrees of
friction; regular, reduced and high friction. Bredent has more than ten
years o experience in manufacturing resin/metal precision attachments.
For further details contact us at 1-800-250-5111 or e-mail us at info@dent-line.com
Ancient Dental Implant Found
Scientists have found what is apparently the earliest known dental
implant: a wrought iron tooth in a man who lived about 1,900 years ago
in Gaul, or what is now known as France. The discovery was made in the
Gallo-Roman cemetery south of Paris. X-rays show a perfect fit in the tooth
socket in the upper right jaw. The implant was apparently jammed into place
more than a year before the man died, according to a report by French researchers
in Nature. Although Ancient Etruscans in northern Italy were known
to have made partial dentures, crowns and simple bridges as early as 2,500
years ago, the French finds appears to be the oldest known dental implant.
The patient's original tooth was used as a model and the implant was probably
installed soon after the tooth was lost.
Source: Danbury News Times, January 1, 1998.
Kym Rada, RDT Interviewed on VKS
Mr. Kym Rada, R.D.T. is the owner of Adelaide Ceramics, a high quality
dental lab in Ottawa, Ontario. He has been using the Bredent VKS Snap Attachment
System for the past six years and we wanted to know why he recommends them.
Q How extensively do you use the VKS attachments?
A. As you are aware, there are five classes of attachments that are in common use. They are the ridged, vertical, hinged, combination and rotational. The Bredent VKS attachments can be used in four of five of these categories. I've used attachments for the past 15 years and found that these attachments are the best since they are universal and can be used in varied cases with just one system.
Q How do the VKS attachments fit into your marketing plan?
A. It's an incredibly good attachment for cosmetics, since you can achieve superior aesthetics. The mini SG for example can be placed lower on the crown closer to the gingiva thus allowing more room for aesthetics.
Q Tell us what you like about them?
A. They are amazingly easy for the technician to use, uncomplicated, you might say. They are also easy for the dentist to use since they have more control chair side. It's convenient and practical for the dentist to exchange the retention sleeve chair side rather than send the patient to the lab for it.
Q How do you convince your dentist to use the VKS attachments?
A. That's simple, even if some dentists are subscribing to the attachment of the month. Many over evaluate the complexity of the cases. I tell them the VKS snap attachment is easy to use since you can change them chair side. It makes life simple - it works for me.
Factors for Attachment Selection:
1. Cost.
2. Condition of periodontal support.
3. Condition of residual ridge.
4. Opposing Arch/Vertical dimension.
5. Strength of Bite/Bruxer.
6. The number of abutments.
7. The position of the abutments.
8. Patient dexterity.
9. Limited bucco-lingual space.
10. Limited mesio-distal space.
The Dent-liner; Vol. 2, No. 1
Publisher: Peter T. Pontsa RDT
Editor: A. Van Breemen BA
E-Mail: info@dent-line.com